On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 16:26 -0700, Jonathan Feally wrote: > Dan, > I'm not sure who put that in the UPGRADING doc, but 5.0.x will work > fine. I have not tested 5.1.x for performance fixes in a while. 5.1.x > could be ok now, but if you can run 5.0.83 then do that for best bets.
Great. Thanks for the quick response :) Dan > I > have not tried 5.4.x, so I can't comment on that other than its pretty > new. The 6.x is a definite no as index key sizes are not big enough with > utf-8 to accommodate some of our indexs on multi-columns. > > -Jon > > Dan wrote: > > Hi people. > > > > I just did a 'git pull' and was about to start building, when I though > > "I'd better check the UPGRADING notes". > > > > This doc states that MySQL 5.1 is required. Now last time I checked, > > this upgrade wasn't such a good idea - particularly with DBMail if I > > remember messages from a couple of months back. Is it now OK to upgrade > > to MySQL 5.1? Is it really a dependancy, or is 5.0.x OK? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Dan > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DBmail mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail > > > > > > _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
