Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Dienstag 11 August 2009 Reindl Harald wrote: >> Please do not missunderstand me: Because of this things i got as >> nearly no sleep searching and patching things that should work out of >> the box while our customers are standing with a loaded gun behind me > > By shouting at people you won't get more help. If you offer to pay Paul > for a feature you need, or ask very friendly, maybe he'd implement it > quickly. Just last week he implemented IPv6 support within a short time. > > On the other hand, Paul, having secure methods directly implemented > would really be nice. Just because the *MD5 methods require plaintext > pwds doesn't mean it shouldn't be implemented. It should just be > disabled by those having encrypted pwds. (/me having cleartext pwds, so > could use the feature now *g*). As far as I could read from your words, > it should be easy to implement?
Not *that* simple, but I did it nonetheless. My GIT master tree now supports AUTH=CRAM-MD5. This will however *only* work for people using authsql and plaintext passwords. -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
