Shane, Briefly looking at the two RFC's, i think we could do this, but it will take some work. This would have to go into the 2.3.x branch. What client are you using that is supposed to support CONDSTORE and QRESYNC?
Paul, I think we can add a modseq bigint to the messages table. This value would be copied from the mailboxes seq. So we update a message, update the seq, copy seq to that modified message, repeat for other messages. This should satisfy the CONDSTORE requirements. Getting to protocol responses and handling correct would take a while to cover all the scenarios. -Jon Shane Kerr wrote: > Hello, > > Can any of the developers give any indication of how painful it would be > to add support for quick synchronization? > > http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=4551 > http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=5162 > > I'm not asking for a feature (although it would be nice), but rather a > sense of the scale of the task. > > It makes me sad to have to check the status of every message in a > mailbox to see if any changes were made. ;) > > Cheers, > > -- > Shane > > _______________________________________________ > DBmail mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail > > -- Scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
