On Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2009 Tomas Kuliavas wrote: > DBMail might find its niche in some setups, but large mailboxes are > not in that niche. 750 GB DB proves it. You can't do text search raw > email sources. There is no point of storing them in DB.
And you believe doing a raw text search on a 750GB flat file mailserver would be fast? dbmail 2.3 is different in that it stores mimeparts separately. Maybe a full text search skips binary attachments there. Paul? What I'd like to know from Daniel: Do you have 750G of real data, or is that just your DB size. It seems your setup is not optimized at all, a lost connection shows your server can't keep up with the load. Maybe all mysql Parameters need tuning anyway. dbmail heavily depends on a good DBA to give good performance. Once you have more than 10GB and 100+ users you see the difference. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 6531 .network.your.ideas. // // Wir haben zwei Häuser zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://willhaben.at/iad/realestate/object?adId=15306857
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
