NetBSD's simple comment out seems to have done the trick nicely. I'm not seeing any ill effects from it on my production box.
-Jon Paul J Stevens wrote: > Looks like a mhash upstream distribution bug. > > Debian and netbsd have fixed this themselves. So should Freebsd if it > hasn't already. Short of a mhash upstream release that fixes this, of > course, which it won't. > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=473204 > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-bugs/2008/10/19/msg028900.html > > The netbsd patch is just too trivial. > > If you have an elegant solution please share. > > > Jonathan Feally wrote: > >> Paul, >> This problem still exists on FreeBSD - just did a fresh git and compile. >> The version 0.9.9 is the version of mhash on the system as it is setting >> the PACKAGE_VERSION defines/declares before we try to set them again to >> our version. Perhaps we can just create our own DBMAIL_VERSION to be >> used for this case? >> >> -Jon >> >> On 3/8/2010 12:21 AM, Paul J Stevens wrote: >> >>> Andrea Brancatelli wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Now, that's funny :-) >>>> >>>> [r...@mirtillo ~]# pkg_info | grep dbmail >>>> dbmail-2.3.6 An SQL database-based mail system (POP3 and IMAP) >>>> >>>> [r...@mirtillo ~]# dbmail-imapd -V >>>> This is DBMail version 0.9.9 >>>> >>>> Is this "correct"? :-) >>>> >>>> >>> It isn't, but it's already fixed. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- Scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
