What was planned? Removing them or not? I really don't care either way I just wanted to make sure the tables were removed if the functionality is removed and the tables were kept if the functionality is being maintained.
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 00:39:10 +0200 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Dbmail] auto_notify auto_reply this was planned some times ago with some off-list mails and a little money you can bring paul to make changes if they are really important for you and others will have this features too since it would make no sense having different forks so if 5 small companies take a little money in their hand there are many things possible in a short time in a way it would never be possible with commercial software and this is they way opensource works at it's best * the main developer diesgns the software for his needs * takes inputs from the community if he like them * if he not like some things you can pay him to like them too :-) Am 06.05.2011 00:04, schrieb Eric Hiller: > I thought that auto_reply and auto_notify were completely unsupported at this > point? > > Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 22:54:04 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Dbmail] auto_notify auto_reply > > > Am 05.05.2011 22:17, schrieb Eric Hiller: >> Looks like the tables for these were removed entirely in 3.0 create.sql but >> they were >> not dropped in the update_2_2_3_0.sql file. Should they be removed manually? > > autoreply comes back as far as i know in the final :-) _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
_______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
