Tell me,

What's your configuration?

- total users
- +/- simultaneous connections per minute
- DB size on this moment


Just want to compare with my setup

(
- 1800 users
- 250/300 simultaneous connections
- 185GB right now
)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Harald Leithner
> Sent: segunda-feira, 12 de Agosto de 2013 10:33
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail 3.1.2 status
> 
> Hi,
> 
> my 2 cents,
> 
> Am 11.08.2013, 23:11 Uhr, schrieb Paul J Stevens <[email protected]>:
> 
> >
> > Harald,
> >
> > thanks for reporting.
> >
> > On 2013-08-10 02:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> after a week running dbmail 3.1 a short report
> >>
> >> * memory usage: perfect, dbmail-imapd currentyl 133 MB
> >>   and sometimes it goes below 100 MB
> >>   so no leaks and dail restarts needed
> >
> > I see the same, and still improving in the master branch. And it's
> not
> > only the memory footprint that improves because of this, but also
> > speed to some extend.
> >
> 
> Uptime 4 Days consumes 882M mb memory, it leaks about 200 MB per day.
> But performance is great.
> 
> >
> >> some small issues with no idea how to debug because
> >> it happens not often enough to enable debug-logs in
> >> production or not possible to reproduce with my clients
> >
> > If it's impossible to reproduce reliably, it's difficult to debug. I
> run
> > into smaller and bigger problems all the time, mostly from testing
> with
> > the stuff in test-scripts. Also, adding new IMAP capabilities like
> I've
> > been busy doing since 3.1.2 exposes older code to review and
> > refactoring. I finally have a simple but effective framework in place
> > for automatic schema migrations - very cool. So, when adding a rather
> > complex capability like CONDSTORE (rfc4551) only takes a day or two,
> it
> > gives me a nice fuzzy feeling about the state of the code. I must be
> > doing something right. Of course that feeling disappears as I stumble
> on
> > older code that doesn't look quite right...
> 
> Its really great that you add new stuff, do you know  a table which
> client
> supports with imap extension?
> 
> Any thing new on RFC6154, if I understood it correctly you can extend
> the
> users table with the 7 Fields and set the SPECIAL-USE defaults in
> dbmail.conf.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >> * IMAP / Tunderbird: in the message-list randomly empty subject
> >>  it is present in the preview
> >
> > I've seen it, right around 3.1.0 or 3.1.1, but not since...
> 
> No problems with this.
> 
> >
> >>  mostly folder-options -> rapair let it appear in the list
> >>  sometimes this is need twice, i can find no logic there
> >>  maybe some timing/race-conditions, hard to debug
> >>
> >> * Apple Mail - i hate it
> >>   POP3 as well as IMAP until now 3 messages which are
> >>   reported to me with empy or crippeled body
> >>   AFAIK all times multipart-messages
> >
> > That is possibly a combination of the exact IMAP commands that expose
> a
> > bug in GMime. Only way to know for sure is by running the IMAP
> commands
> > Apple uses to fetch a message, against the exact MIME structure of
> the
> > message involved.
> >
> > And even updating GMime is not guaranteed to fix things, since I've
> > worked around problems and limitations in GMime in the past, rather
> than
> > getting them fixed or dealt with in GMime proper.
> >
> > GMime is really nice and it's author very helpful. It does however
> > depend on downstream users like dbmail for battle-testing some parts
> of
> > the code.
> 
> My 10 Apple Mail clients don't have this problem.
> 
> >
> >>   in all cases no problem in roundcube-mail or Thunderbird
> >
> > Good. I really love how much more responsive especially imap now is,
> > compared with 3.0.2.
> >
> >> * twice one thread appeared to consume 100% CPU without
> >>   lead to troubles for active users and SIGTERM ignroed
> >
> > I would try to strace the thread involved. Maybe that will give me
> some
> > hint as to where it's happening in the code.
> >
> > top -bH -n 1 -p <PID>
> >
> > should give you a listing of the threads, with process-ids per
> thread.
> > Maybe one particular thread is causing havoc, which you can then
> strace.
> >
> >
> 
> I would upgrade use SIGHUP to debug, but no time atm and my customers
> should have a short period of time with a great working mail server
> without experiments ;-)
> >
> >
> >
> >> _____________________________________________
> >>
> >> [root@mail:~]$ systemctl status dbmail-imapd.service
> >> dbmail-imapd.service - DBMail IMAP Server
> >>    Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/dbmail-imapd.service;
> >> enabled)
> >>    Active: active (running) since Di 2013-08-06 14:08:19 CEST; 3
> days
> >> ago
> >>  Main PID: 5921 (dbmail-imapd)
> >>    CGroup: name=systemd:/system/dbmail-imapd.service
> >>            └─5921 /usr/sbin/dbmail-imapd -D
> >
> 
> 
> thx
> 
> --
> Harald Leithner
> 
> ITronic
> Vogelweidplatz 12, 1150 Wien, Austria
> Tel: +43-1-786 23 88
> Fax: +43-1-98 52 077
> Mobil: +43-699-123 78 4 78
> Mail: [email protected] | itronic.at
> _______________________________________________
> DBmail mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Reply via email to