Cool! Cant wait to see the results of your current work.
Thanks,
Chux
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Pablo N. Mendes <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> The current perception is that a couple of paragraphs mentioning the
> entity seem to be good enough.
>
> For a more rigorous answer, you may have to wait for the experiments that
> we are running for a paper that we're working on, where we actually test
> several hypothesis.
>
> Cheers,
> Pablo
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Chux <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Pablo,
>>
>> I guess I'm looking for the optimal amount of supporting text for
>> spotlight to annotate correctly.
>>
>> Say in automated environments where the amount of text is variable, you'd
>> want some threshold for the length of the context to not overload the
>> spotlight web service.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chux
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Pablo N. Mendes <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chux.
>>> Why not the entire paragraph?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Pablo
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Chux <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>
>>>> I asked before about "manual spotting" and as follow up to that, I was
>>>> wondering what would be the most effective placement of a "Spot" to be
>>>> disambiguated within a context for Spotlight to make the most accurate
>>>> disambiguation, since spotlight is looking at the context of a word before
>>>> it is annotated. Is it in the beginning of a context, middle or end?
>>>>
>>>> For example on the same case:
>>>>
>>>> *(1) Windows. For the same $1,299 you could spend on this 21.5-inch
>>>> Apple iMac, you can buy a 23-inch or even a 27-inch (2) Windows-based
>>>> all-in-one, and with more robust features.*
>>>> *Yes, for better or for worse, those other PCs have (3) Windows 8.
>>>> They also have touch screens and optical drives, features that Apple has
>>>> deemed inessential for a desktop. You might agree with Apple. You might
>>>> also accept Apple's hallmark design excellence and display quality as
>>>> worthy substitutions. You might even need or want a particular function of
>>>> OS X that you can't get in a (4) Windows PC.*
>>>>
>>>> So for example I chose to manually annotate *(3)*, will it give me a
>>>> higher chance of having a correct disambiguation of *"Windows"*compared
>>>> to picking
>>>> *(1)*,* (2)*, or *(4)*?
>>>>
>>>> Essentially what I'm looking to get to is how much context do I need to
>>>> feed spotlight (in my case since I wanted a manual way to spot words) for
>>>> it to be accurate.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Chux
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
>>>> Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
>>>> endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
>>>> tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Dbp-spotlight-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbp-spotlight-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Pablo N. Mendes
>>> http://pablomendes.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Pablo N. Mendes
> http://pablomendes.com
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Dbp-spotlight-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbp-spotlight-users
