Hi Andrea
I'm bit confused.
In a previous mail on this thread you mentioned that
dbp:A skos:broader dbp:B means that A is a sub-category of B; so I can these
relations to build a directed graph (e.g. B -> A) and then find leaves.
So what I separated the triples having "skos:broader" and filter out all
other triples (this is mentioned here[1]); because I can only use "
skos:broader" relationship to detect child-parent relationship right?
$ bzgrep "1612_establishments_in_Mexico" skos_categories_en.ttl.bz2
> <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1612_establishments_in_Mexico> <
> http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <
> http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept> .
> <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1612_establishments_in_Mexico> <
> http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#prefLabel> "1612 establishments in
> Mexico"@en .
>
> So the category referred to in the issue seems to be there in the file.
>
Yes this is there in the file but it's not a type of "skos:broader", which
I can get the parent-child relationship.
So first tell me using only the triples with "skos:broader" is wrong?
(Then we will come back to my claim "categories that don't have a broader
category are not included in dump 2")
[1] https://github.com/dbpedia/dbpedia-links/issues/16
--
Regards
Kasun Perera
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-developers
