Hi Fred Frederick Giasson a écrit : > Hi Bernard, > > Well, if humans are typed has Queen102313008; it is indeed shocking :) It is!
http://dbpedia.org/page/Queen_Silvia_of_Sweden http://dbpedia.org/page/Cleopatra_VII definitely human http://dbpedia.org/page/Galadriel if you don't mind the pointed ears she looks more human than many creatures I've met in my life and which called themselves so. :-) > > Some backgrounds of the issue here: > > This queen refers to this WordNet word sense: > > {02313008} [05] S: > <http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?o2=&o0=1&o7=1&o5=1&o1=1&o6=&o4=&o3=1&s=queen&i=0&h=000000000000#c> > > (n) *queen#1* (the only fertile female in a colony of social insects > such as bees and ants and termites; its function is to lay eggs) > > That is an insect. Indeed. > > The problem is not with Yago, but potentially with its integration > into DBPedia (I didn't investigated further than by reading your mail). Certainly. Typical vocabulary clash ... > > What one have to take into account when using Yago is that these > concepts (as Queen) come from WordNet, so one concept has, in most of > the cases, more than one word sense. Word senses are tagged with the > WordNet word sense number (0231....). Understood. I'm sure DBpedia team is aware of those homonymy issues and will improve the extraction to handle them more correctly in future versions. Bernard <http://mondeca.wordpress.com/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
