On 24 Jan 2008, at 15:26, Simon Spero wrote: >> Like skos:subject, dcterms:subject seems to be intended for use on >> documents, not people or cities. Hence it doesn't really meet >> DBpedia's requirements. > > The meaning of "document" in this context is extremely broad; if we > follow Otlet's definition of a document as anything which can > convey information to an observer(Buckland 1997), the term would > seem to cover anything which can have a subject. > > By this standard, timbl is a document, but only when someone's > looking.
Sorry, but you lost me there. Where I live, people are not documents, and I like it here. Richard > > > Simon > > Buckland, Michael K. “What is a ?document.” Journal of the American > Society for Information Science 48, no. 9 (1997): 804-809. > http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~buckland/whatdoc.html > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
