Hi Richard, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> Interesting project. Just a word of caution: Note that DBpedia isn't > an ontology. From an ontology point of view, DBpedia is just a bunch > of instances, without a nice well-engineered class hierarchy. Two > different experimental class hierarchies are available for DBpedia > (YAGO and CWCC), but both have their flaws, are very complex, and I > wouldn't say that they represent the "natural order of things" -- > maybe rather the "natural disorder of things" ;-) I see from the downloads page that CWCC is the Cleaned (misspelled) Wikipedia Category Class hierarchy, but that is a new one for me. I googled and was not able to find more. Could you some background and links on CWCC? Thanks, Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
