Bob,

It's a bug. An incompatibility between Snorql and Virtuoso. Virtuoso  
applies content negotiation to the query result, and your browser  
indicates that it prefers HTML over SPARQL XML Results, so this is  
what Virtuoso will send...

Workaround: Append "&output=xml" to the URI to get the XML. Or use a  
non-browser client (such as curl or wget) to access the URI.

Best,
Richard



On 25 Oct 2008, at 18:28, Bob DuCharme wrote:

> When I select "as XML" in the Results field of
> http://dbpedia.org/snorql, I get results in an HTML table with a class
> attribute set to "sparql", when I thought I'd get the XML described at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-rdf-sparql-XMLres-20080115/.
>
> Also, when I select a Result value of "as XML+XSLT" I get the same  
> HTML
> table described above whether I enter a URL for a stylesheet in the
> "XSLT stylesheet URL" field or not.
>
> Could someone give me a little more background on these choices?
>
> thanks,
>
> Bob
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's  
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win  
> great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in  
> the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to