Hello, John Goodwin wrote: > >> John's comment relates to (at least) the axioms on "publisher": >> >> The semantics of range mean that you have essentially asserted that >> the range of published is [Person and Company]. If you want the >> union, you'll have to explicitly use the unionOf constructor here. > > Thanks Sean, yup that's the one. There were a few other cases of that > elsewhere as well.
That's indeed a bug, which we need to fix (should have come out as union instead). You made it kind of hard for me to understand your first post correctly. ;-) > This is also a good example of where (IMHO) the > domain was perhaps over specified. For example all sorts of things > could have publishers, and not the ones listed here. I worry that if > you reuse DBpedia "publisher" elsewhere you could get some undesired > inferences. In the future, there will be a user interface for specifying domains/ranges. (Georgi is working on it.) We hope that the quality of the schema will increase over time. Kind regards, Jens -- Dipl. Inf. Jens Lehmann Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig Homepage: http://www.jens-lehmann.org GPG Key: http://jens-lehmann.org/jens_lehmann.asc ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
