Hi Peter, > Does this look like a bug, or something that was missed in the manual > work that went into creating the ontology?
A bit of both :) The Wikipedia article Ancient_Greek used the template:Language instead of Template:Infobox_Language. Template:Language is a redirect to Infobox_Language, so the article content displays correctly. We had no automated approach to include template-redirects, and we only included the most common template-redirects manually. And missed the template:Language. I've just simply changed the Wikipedia article Ancient_Greek to use template:Infobox_Language now, so we will be fine with the next extraction (will it be the next dataset release once there is a new Wikipedia dump, or via live-update if we manage to implement that soon :) Best, Georgi PS: We should follow up on the conversation we had in London in March about including your work with ChemBoxes into DBpedia... -- Georgi Kobilarov Freie Universität Berlin www.georgikobilarov.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick Murray-John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 8:53 PM > To: [email protected] >> DBpedia > Subject: [Dbpedia-discussion] Missing Ancient Greek with type Language > > I was exploring around today using the dbpedia-owl types for an app > I'll > be working on soon. It will ask teachers to specify the languages they > teach by picking relevant wikipedia pages. So far everything looks > great, but when I did queries for Greek it looks like Ancient Greek was > missing: > > PREFIX dbpedia-owl: <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/> > PREFIX dbprop: <http://dbpedia.org/property/> > PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> > > SELECT DISTINCT ?lang ?fam > WHERE > { > ?lang a dbpedia-owl:Language ; > rdfs:label ?name . > > > OPTIONAL { ?lang dbprop:fam ?fam . } > FILTER (REGEX (?name, 'greek', 'i') ) > > } > > Gets me Modern_Greek, Cappadocian_Greek_Language , and Greek_Language, > but not Ancient_Greek. The dbpedia page > http://dbpedia.org/page/Ancient_Greek shows that it uses the Language > template box, but not that it got the Language type. > > Does this look like a bug, or something that was missed in the manual > work that went into creating the ontology? > > Thanks much! > > Patrick Murray-John > http://semantic.umwblogs.org > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the > world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Dbpedia-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
