Hugh Glaser wrote:
> Hi.
> Looks exciting.
> But I think there are a few problems still.
> Wordnet.owl has some mismatched tags (owl:SymmetricProperty & 
> owl:ObjectProperty).
> And probably rdf:about and rdf:resource in both need sorting so that the 
> files can be moved around without the URI changing.
> rapper picks up stuff like this quite conveniently.
> Best
> Hugh
>   
Adam.

Note the comments above. I haven't had time to look into this myself etc..

Kingsley
> On 18/07/2009 13:13, "Kingsley Idehen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Adam Pease wrote:
>   
>> Hi Kingsley
>>   Just wanted to let you know that I've created a new version of SUMO in
>> OWL, linked to YAGO, and also a version of WordNet 3.0 in OWL that is
>> linked to SUMO (all 100,000+ synsets were linked by hand to SUMO).
>> There are still some improvements I'd like to make, and no doubt cases
>> where I haven't done the right thing in OWL.  I'd benefit from your
>> feedback, and hopefully this work is useful for you even at its current
>> stage.
>> best wishes,
>> Adam
>>
>>     
> See:
>
> http://www.ontologyportal.org/SUMO.owl
> http://www.ontologyportal.org/WordNet.owl
>
>
> --
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen       Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> President & CEO
> OpenLink Software     Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   


-- 


Regards,

Kingsley Idehen       Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO 
OpenLink Software     Web: http://www.openlinksw.com





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to