2009/8/4 Paul Houle <[email protected]>: > Following the idea that "the dbpedia ontology is a classification of > wikipedia pages", I propose that there should be a category for "List > of" pages.
It sounds good to me. Wikipedia isn't a traditional paper based encyclopedia that might restrict itself to concrete topics so it is always going to have things that are either abstract topics (like its mountain of fiction knowledge) or original aggregations, such as all of its lists and classification articles. You might be able to get most of the lists and fiction by parsing the category tree below [1] and [2] as far as I can tell. Cheers, Peter [1] http://dbpedia.org/page/Category:Lists [2] http://dbpedia.org/page/Category:Fiction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
