I used your link.
Here is part of what I see.
 

 
Соединённые Штаты Америки

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama
http://dbpedia.org/property/enw
Barack Hussein Obama II

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama
http://dbpedia.org/property/dechrauTymor
20 Ionawr 2009

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama
http://dbpedia.org/property/dechrauTymor
3 Ionawr 2005

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama
http://dbpedia.org/property/dechrauTymor
8 Ionawr 1997

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama
http://dbpedia.org/property/r_percent_E3_percent_A6kkef_percent_E3_perce
nt_B8lge
http://dbpedia.org/resource/USA%27s_pr%C3%A6sident

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama
http://dbpedia.org/property/r_percent_E3_percent_A6kkef_percent_E3_perce
nt_B8lge
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Senatet_%28USA%29

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama
http://dbpedia.org/property/r_percent_E3_percent_A6kkef_percent_E3_perce
nt_B8lge
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Illinois

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama
http://dbpedia.org/property/r_percent_E3_percent_A6kkef_percent_E3_perce
nt_B8lge
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Amerikanske_pr%C3%A6sidenter

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama
http://dbpedia.org/property/besk_percent_E3_percent_A6ftigelse
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Advokat
 
 
What is all the _percent_E3_A6 stuff. What kind of property is that?
 
I have been running this  query and other similar queries for the last 5
weeks, I have never seen this  percent_E3_A6 stuff.
Why is this here now, it looks like corrupt data to me?
 
Thanks, John
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Thibodeau Jr [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 12:08 PM
To: John Abjanic
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] SPARQL access to DB appears to be
corrupted
 
Hi, John --
 
On Nov 4, 2009, at 02:07 PM, John Abjanic wrote:
> SELECT ?s ?p ?o
>  WHERE {
> ?s ?p ?o.
> FILTER(?s = <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama> ).
> }
 
 
I just tested this query at http://dbpedia.org/sparql/ and got
results that seem OK at first glance.  Certainly they bore no
resemblance to your report.
 
You can see the current output here --
 
<http://dbpedia.org/sparql?default-graph-uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&sh
ould-sponge=&query=SELECT+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo%0D%0A+WHERE+{%0D%0A%3Fs+%3Fp+%3
Fo.%0D%0AFILTER%28%3Fs+%3D+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FBara
ck_Obama%3E+%29.%0D%0A}&format=text%2Fhtml&debug=on&timeout= 
 >
 
How do things look to you now?
 
Can you provide more details about what you're doing to get the
apparently corrupt results?
 
Ted
 
 
 
 
 
-- 
A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
 
Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Evangelism & Support         //        mailto:[email protected]
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
                        http://twitter.com/TallTed
                                  http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/uda/
OpenLink Blogs              http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/
                                http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
     Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to