AzamatAbdoullaev wrote: > Things go in cycles. > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00528.html > >
I'd be interested in hearing your proposal to fix this "mess". Apparently, you have a different notion of the term "ontology" - which is not surprising, given your definition which probably resembles "the ontology is a conceptualization of the world" has been the prevalent one for a long time. These days, a more appropriate definition seems to be "An ontology is the formalization of a conceptualization". The DBpedia ontology definitely fits this definition. I found a blog which has some great explanations [1]. Things do not in cycles at all. :) Regards, Michael [1] http://www.snee.com/bobdc.blog/2007/08/some-great-w3c-explanations-of.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
