Re http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Team

The 'credits' for dbpedia don't currently acknowledge any contribution
outside of the core DBpedia project.

This is natural as a 'who are the dbpedia team?' page (ie. who made
this site/software), but since you link the page as 'Credits' from the
homepage, and have <h1>Credits</h1>  at the top, it would be
appropriate to offer some broader acknowledgements. Even if it's
somehow obvious that DBpedia is from/for/by Wikipedia-lovers,
sometimes it is nice to state the obvious. In conversation people
casually conflate DBpedia with the *data*, and the credits for the
data include the thousands at Wikipedia who edited all those pages.


May I take the liberty of suggesting some text?

"""
DBpedia is essentially a data-oriented interface to the work of the <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_users";>Wikipedia
community</a>, and wouldn't exist without the massive contributions
made by editors and authors at Wikipedia, or without the developers
who built the underlying infrastructure that supports <a
href="http://www.wikipedia.org/";>Wikipedia</a>.  DBpedia is intended
to show how the information spread across many Wikipedia pages can be
combined into a single integrated database. We hope this will make it
easier for the amazing amount of information in Wikipedia to be used
in new and interesting ways, and that it might inspire new mechanisms
for navigating, linking and improving the encyclopaedia itelf. DBpedia
is our way of saying "thank you!" for Wikipedia...
"""

cheers,

Dan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to