Hello, I am planning to train topic models to recognize text content and find the most related skos:Concept from DBpedia. However most of the time the dbpedia nodes for categories / skos:Concept are less informative than the resource assiocated with the main article of the afore mentionned category in wikipedia.
Let's take an example, the category "History" is available as a skos:Concept in dbpedia as: - http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:History It matches the following category page in wikipedia: - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:History On that page you can see the text: The main article for this category is History. Which is a link to the following wikipedia page: - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History Which has the following RDF resource in DBpedia: - http://dbpedia.org/resource/History However the relationship: http://dbpedia.org/resource/History [is the main resource for concept] http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:History is not directly available in the DBpedia graph. So my questions are: 1- Is it safe to assume that for any http://dbpedia.org/page/Category:XXX skos:Concept I can find more data in the matching http://dbpedia.org/resource/XXX resource? 2- Is there a plan to make that relationship more explicit? Regards, -- Olivier http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://code.oliviergrisel.name ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
