Tom Morris wrote: > 2010/5/4 Benjamin Großmann <[email protected]>: > > >> The property for abstract has been changed since DBPedia Version 3.5: >> Instead of dbpedia2:abstract you have to query for dbo:abstract now. Then >> your query works. >> > > Do properties get deprecated for some period of time before they go > away? Are there tools to help application writers find their uses of > deprecated properties? More generally, what strategies can > application writers use to keep their applications from breaking when > new versions are released? > > Tom > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Dbpedia-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion > >
We could put a collection of owl:equivalentProperty assertions in a Named Graph and then use said graph for inference rules. It would mean that for backward compatibility (re. property names) you simply invoke a Virtuoso Inference Rule via the inference rules sparql pragma. Note: this is about using an extension to solve a problem. As per usual re. Virtuoso, its simply an option :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
