2010/5/6 Kingsley Idehen <[email protected]>:
> Olivier Grisel wrote:
>>
>> 2010/5/5 Paul Houle <[email protected]>:
>>
>>>
>>> Just some thoughts here:
>>>
>>> (1) Sometimes page links get repeated.  I think this is just because
>>> page A has N links to page B.  This doesn't have much semantic impact,
>>> but it does bulk up the files a bit (though less w/ bz2) and makes more
>>> work for my importer script
>>>
>>
>> That can be important to some extent when computing the PageRank of
>> the wikipedia graph. Or other graph algorithms to mesure the proximity
>> / relatedness of entities.
>>
>> BTW, that would be great if the DBpedia project could compute and
>> distribute the PageRank or the TunkRank [1] values for the DBpedia
>> resources based on the data of the page links graph. This is a really
>> good scoring heuristic when performing fuzzy text named queries with
>> several homonymic matches.
>>
>> [1] http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/13/a-twitter-analog-to-pagerank/
>>
>
> Olivier,
>
> Have you looked at this interface to DBpedia: http://dbpedia.org/fct ? Also
> look at the Entity Rank details in the "About" section.
>
> Basically, you have two ranking schemes in place:
>
> 1. Entity Rank -- based on Link Coefficients
> 2. Text Scores
>
> With Virtuoso you can use both or either to order you SPARQL query results.
> This has been so for quite some time now.


Yes sure I know that virtuoso is able to do it. It would still be
interesting to have that info in raw N-TRIPLES exports in the download
section of DBpedia for the millions of dbpedia entities for offline
batch processing out of any triple store.

It should not be a big deal to implement PageRank with Hadoop and Pig
but having it computed once and usable by anybody would still be
useful IMHO.

-- 
Olivier
http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to