> I think this is simply an efficiency issue. The amount of free images
>
> is considerably larger than the amount of non-free images. I suppose
>> that not a lot of machines are be capable of storing all free images
>> in a table, but they can do so for the non-free ones.
>>
>
If this is the case, we could do the opposite, catching all the non-free
ones with the copyright codes again and each country defines their "non
free" codes
> I think it goes a lot further than that.
>
> CC-BY, CC-BY-SA and PD mean very different things. To use CC-BY and
> CC-BY-SA content legally you need to capture the intention that the original
> author had about attribution. The legal status of different kinds of "PD"
> are quite different in different jurisdictions; particularly PD-ART.
>
but i think the best should be some kind of mapping (like the infobox
mappings) for each code to a copyright, maybe in the dbpedia ontology or i
don't know if there is another ontology that defines them.
Jim
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
