Whoops, sorry, this didn't go to the list ...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sabine Cretella
Date: Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] OntologyProperty etc.
To: Paul Kreis
Thank you for your help Paul!
I just made the changes and cleaned up.
Por now I will only add what I can to the mappings without having to create
new properties etc. Better not to mix up things, it's easier to add once I
got used to working on the mappings or for someone who already knows a lot
more. There's a lot to do anyway.
Another bit needed is the translation of labels - so theres indeed enough to
do around.
Cheers, Bina
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Paul Kreis <[email protected]> wrote:
> .....
>
> There is no need for your new ontology class "Water". The class BodyOfWater
> already represents this general class for water areas.
> For the Atoll mapping you need a ontology property for a BodyOfWater in
> that the Atoll is located.To make this clear you should name the ontology
> property locatedInBodyOfWater. That would look like this:
>
> {{ObjectProperty
> | rdfs:la...@en = locatedInBodyOfWater
> | rdfs:comm...@en = ex. an ocean is a water
> | rdfs:la...@de = Gewässer
> | rdfs:domain = place
> | rdfs:range = BodyOfWater
> }}
>
> But the easier and more abstract way is to take the locatedInArea ontology
> property that already exists.
> http://mappings.dbpedia.org/index.php/OntologyProperty:LocatedInArea
>
> .........
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
