...and say welcome to something else? :-) skos:subject doesn't exist anymore in the SKOS Vocabulary [1]. It has been removed since longtime (2005) [2]. They suggest to turn to other vocabularies, e.g., dct:subject [3, 4, 5].
Why don't we listen to this suggestion, and modify the extraction framework (it's just one line of code) so that the next DBpedia release will have the right subject relation to link a resource to a category? If you think that we absolutely need the old property, we could provide triples both with skos:subject and with dct:subject. Existing applications would continue to work and new applications could use the new prop. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/skos.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/#namespace [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer/#secindexing [4] http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-subject [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/Indexing cheers. -- Roberto Mirizzi PhD student at Politecnico di Bari (Italy) http://sisinflab.poliba.it ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for PL/SQL, new data types, scalar functions, improved concurrency, built-in packages, OCI, SQL*Plus, data movement tools, best practices and more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
