Hi,
Thanks for the reply. Yes, if you can assist me in this task
this is fine. Which is the best/fast way ?
Alessio
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] Italian short / long abstract problem
From: Sebastian Hellmann <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, September 22, 2011 10:06 am
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Dear Alessio,
Sorry, but this is actually not on the top of our Todo list.
We could assist you a little in fixing the problem.
Would you be willing to try it?
Sebastian
On 09/22/2011 02:02 PM, [email protected] wrote:Hello,
In DBPedia 3.7, a big amunt of long and short abstract for the Italian language are messed.They start from the second sentence of the Wikipedia article, skipping the first one, so theabstract as a whole is of a little use as the subject is often unclear.
Is possible to fix that problem ?
Alessio------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2_______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
