> Thanks, but the link you provide doesn't mention "IRI" once.
you have a point on that :) > In terms of RDF the IRI http://dbpedia.org/resource/Gerhard_Schr%C3%B6der is > not equivalent to the IRI http://dbpedia.org/resource/Gerhard_Schröder . > Also try requesting http://dbpedia.org/resource/Gerhard_Schröder on > http://dbpedia.org/sparql and you'll see that you don't get results, while > you get results for http://dbpedia.org/resource/Gerhard_Schr%C3%B6der . they are indeed different, but as I said, the English version didn't change at all, it still uses URIs. That is the reason you don't get results from http://dbpedia.org/resource/Gerhard_Schröder Only 15 multilingual versions use IRI and their own namespace (e.g. de.dbpedia.org). > The el.dbpedia.org SPARQL endpoint seems to be down. Also be aware that there > will be quite a lot of people who aren't able to type those requests. I know > this shouldn't be a key point, as "in the near future intelligent agents will > construct all those requests for us", but in the meantime it is a problem. I > don't have those keys on my keyboard :-/ You might don't have the letters in your keyboard, but people who want to write queries in their language don't have to memorize the Unicode mappings to translate them to %-encoding... The same applies for readability, Cheers, Dimitris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
