Hi Christopher (or do you prefer Jona? :-) ),

On 5/4/12 11:23 AM, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just remembered there already is a similar DBpedia property: runtime
> [1][2]. It even declares schema:duration as owl:equivalentProperty.
>
> The name 'runtime' is less than perfect and only applies to movies
> etc, 'duration' is more general.
Yep, that's the point. The property has multiple domains i.e. Event, 
MediaObject, Movie, MusicRecording.
  For example, schema.org/Movie also
> uses schema:duration. Maybe we should have renamed 'runtime' to
> 'duration' instead?
We could create specific properties for each domain and link them to 
schema:duration (maybe as subproperties). In this way, we can keep 
'runtime' just for movies. But I think it would be clearer to enable 
multiple domain/ranges declaration in the wiki.
>
> While it's on our wiki, I just changed schema:duration from
> ObjectProperty to DatatypeProperty. It has range schema.org/Duration,
> which because of the capital D looks like a class, but is actually a
> datatype that looks equivalent to xsd:duration.
I started a discussion in the wiki about that.
>
> At first I liked the idea of using schema.org properties and types,
> but maybe we should wait until the RDF schema for schema.org is
> published and used.
There is an official OWL [1] as well as an RDFS [2], but I don't know 
whether they are actually used or not.
  For example, schema:duration doesn't have a
> dereferencable URI yet.

In conclusion, the open question is: should we try to reuse existing 
ontology terms i.e. schema.org or add new ones under the dbpedia namespace?
Cheers,

Marco

[1] http://schema.org/docs/schemaorg.owl
[2] http://schema.rdfs.org/


>
> Regards,
> Christopher
>
> [1] http://dbpedia.org/ontology/runtime
> [2] http://mappings.dbpedia.org/index.php/OntologyProperty:Runtime
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt
> <[email protected]>  wrote:
>>> OK, so should I add schema:duration in the wiki?
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Marco Fossati<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>> First of all, thanks for the quick answer.
>>>
>>> On 5/2/12 8:23 PM, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
>>>> On 2 May 2012 17:10, Marco Fossati<[email protected]>    wrote:
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just added a mapping [1] in the wiki and I got validation errors
>>>>> like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> Couldn't load property mapping on page title=Box
>>>>> successione;ns=212/Mapping it/Mapping it;language:wiki=en,locale=en.
>>>>> Details: Ontology property not found: schema:duration
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm actually using a property coming from schema.org ontology.
>>>>> Validation works well when using foaf ontology for example.
>>>>> Any hints?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Properties like foaf:name have entries in the wiki (e.g.,
>>>> http://mappings.dbpedia.org/index.php/OntologyProperty:Foaf:name)
>>>> schema:duration doesn't, hence the error.
>>> OK, so should I add schema:duration in the wiki?
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you in advance.
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Marco
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://mappings.dbpedia.org/index.php/Mapping_it:Box_successione
>>>>
>>>> Here, you would ideally use:
>>>>        {{DateIntervalMapping
>>>>             | templateProperty = periodo
>>>>             | startDateOntologyProperty = activeYearsStartYear
>>>>             | endDateOntologyProperty = activeYearsEndYear
>>>>           }}
>>>>
>>>> but the date interval parser would need some changes for
>>>> language-specific intervals (that is, it expects things like '[[1900]]
>>>> - [[1910]]', and won't catch things like 'dal [[1900]] al [[1910]]')
>>>>
>>> I will investigate this solution.
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Marco
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to