On 5/4/12 2:17 PM, Pablo Mendes wrote:


Hi Kingsley,
You're right that there's much to be embelished there. It was put together in a self imposed least-effort-max-effect regiment.

It would be really nice if we could easily trace and aggregate the contributions by country, but that would probably go over my "effort budget". Unless there's an easy way I do not see now?


Google Spreadsheet.

Instead, I chose to aggregate by language, and those don't map 1x1 to countries.

The DBpedia Portuguese, for example, is kept mostly by an active community in Brazil.

Choosing the Portugal flag would do injustice to them. But choosing the Brazil flag might make it less interesting for Portuguese or African colleagues to join the Lusophone team.


True!

Perhaps somebody else in the DBpedia community will join in and write a little client/scraper that extracts the number of edits on mappings.dbpedia.org <http://mappings.dbpedia.org> by country?


Yes, and maybe dump in a spreadsheet first.

Kingsley

Cheers
Pablo

On May 4, 2012 7:11 PM, "Kingsley Idehen" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


--

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen





Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to