Hi, I think there's a slight inconsistency in some FOAF triples published by DBpedia.
For example, see these triples from http://downloads.dbpedia.org/preview.php?file=3.7_sl_en_sl_wikipedia_links_en.nq.bz2 : <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopic> <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Anarchism> . <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Anarchism> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/page> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism> . DBpedia basically uses foaf:primaryTopic and foaf:page as inverse properties, but the foaf spec says: foaf:page -> http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_page The page property relates a thing to a document about that thing. As such it is an inverse of the topic property, which relates a document to a thing that the document is about. foaf:primaryTopic -> http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_primaryTopic The primaryTopic property relates a document to the main thing that the document is about. It is an inverse of the isPrimaryTopicOf property, which relates a thing to a document primarily about that thing. I think DBpedia should use either - foaf:primaryTopic and foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf or - foaf:page and foaf:topic What do you think? Cheers, Christopher ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
