Hi *, (I was redirected from the German dbpedia list[5] to this mailing list). (Btw, sorry for not having the time to further examine the paper which explains yago and dbpedia[1]. I am just pointing to things showing on the surface.)
A German wikipedia resource[0] describes a novel and thus is categorizied as literature. Now, their is a the link to "other languages", and these resources describe the movie based on that novel. (It's wrong to link theses resources with owl:sameAs, but of course you can only take what's there.) The german dbpedia entry is rdf:typed using a subset of rdf:type clearly coming from the international dbpedia[3]. Now, what makes me curious is: 1. why is for the German dbpedia entry[4] only taken a subset of rdf:type of the English one[3] ? 2. why is no rdf:type reflecting that the resource[4] is (at least) also a novel? (I guess being typed as literature and a movie at the same time is semantically a contradiction, but then it would be fine to mark that contradiction in the dataset.) -o [0]https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verzauberter_April [1]http://www2007.org/papers/paper391.pdf [3]http://dbpedia.org/resource/Enchanted_April [4]http://de.dbpedia.org/resource/Verzauberter_April [5]https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4FB3E30F.6080503%40gmail.com&forum_name=dbpedia-germany ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
