On 23.05.2012 18:04, Ziqi Zhang wrote: > Thanks, I see you point. > > Yes its arguable whether one should assume the disambiguation page as a > sense inventory for WSD. It's true that the other approach clearly has > certain advantages but also possibly extensive computational overheads. > In my case i am considering other tasks rather than WSD, say determinig > the degree of synonymity of two words, where no contexts are given for > disambiguation. Typically one evaluates this by looking at the possible > senses for each term - in theory I can also take the whole knowledge > base as the possible candidate sense inventory regardless of what are > listed on the "disambiguation" page but that seems to be lots of > computation and impractical. > It's true that it requires a lot of computation. But both DBpedia extraction framework and Wikipedia Miner provide ready made solutions for this task. What is more, you can download the data extracted from the English Wikipedia by Wikipeda Miner from its homepage [1]. It is not as fresh as latest DBpedia, but still it is quite valuable.
Cheers, Aleksander [1] http://wikipedia-miner.cms.waikato.ac.nz/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
