On 10/11/2012 02:37 AM, Pablo N. Mendes wrote:
>
>
> Those counts to which you refer are "incoming page links" and the ones
> that Paul mentions are "page views".
>
Oh, now I see ! So "page count" is quite an ambiguous term, then, as it
could stand for links as well as views, which clearly are vastly
different things.
> The latter are aggregated by time period so there are many numbers for
> one page even if you aggregate it into one number per week (using
> Paul's example). I think Paul meant that it is difficult to find a
> good period to sample so that you'd have one number per page that
> reflects whatever notion of importance you may have in mind.
>
Indeed, views are very volatile, and for that reason alone probably not
a good metric, at least for the domain of data I'm interested in.
Thanks,
Stefan
--
...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
