Hi Vladimir and thanks for the feedback! On 9/7/15 2:57 PM, Vladimir Alexiev wrote: > Hi Marco! > > A couple of questions about DBtax: > - could you publish the ontology in a resolvable way? > E.g. http://it.dbpedia.org/resource/Bitcoin/html has rdf:type > http://dbpedia.org/dbtax/Term but that doesn’t resolve. Sure, it's in the list of things to be done. > - are there definitions of the classes? Since DBTax is an automatic approach, it is difficult to automatically generate human-readable definitions. I believe this can be crowdsourced to the DBpedia mappings wiki, what fo you think? > E.g. Bitcoin has these classes, but I think those marked with !! are wrong > and those with ?? are hard to tell before we have a definition for them > dbtax: Page !! > dbtax: Article !! > dbtax: Protocol > dbtax: Communication > dbtax: Term ?? > dbtax: Payment > > Also looking in http://it.dbpedia.org/downloads/dbtax/T-Box.ttl, it's hard to > tell what these mean: > > dbtax:Center rdfs:label "Center"@en ; rdfs:subClassOf dbtax:Art . > dbtax:Pagoda rdfs:label "Pagoda"@en ; rdfs:subClassOf dbtax:Art . > dbtax:Term rdfs:label "Term"@en ; rdfs:subClassOf dbtax:Art . > > Cheers! > Cheers, -- Marco Fossati http://about.me/marco.fossati Twitter: @hjfocs Skype: hell_j
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
