Hi all,
for the dev telco on Wednesday, I prepared a Google doc which lists pros
and cons of different editors:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HwtJJ3jIlrQAPwHYhvpw4a4Z4hZorTGaZTB8Bq8Y-TI/edit#
Note that I am especially interested in tracking the ontology and keep
its consistency. We don't need a GUI with the sole purpose that people
can add classes randomly like it is already the case in the mappings
wiki. So turtle is a plus as you can assume some experience with OWL
editing. Discussion and discussion tracking feature is also quite
important, the slides of Vladimir summarize this quite well:
https://www.slideshare.net/valexiev1/dbpedia-problems
For other tasks, which are simple we need very easy ways to contribute,
e.g. class and property labels in all languages or adding links to other
vocabularies, although these need to be validated carefully, see also
slides from Vlad.
--
All the best,
Sebastian Hellmann
Director of Knowledge Integration and Linked Data Technologies (KILT)
Competence Center
at the Institute for Applied Informatics (InfAI) at Leipzig University
Executive Director of the DBpedia Association
Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://nlp2rdf.org,
http://linguistics.okfn.org, https://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt
<http://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt>
Homepage: http://aksw.org/SebastianHellmann
Research Group: http://aksw.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
DBpedia-discussion mailing list
DBpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
