Neat stuff.

The design covers a wide range but it does so very thinly. I would like to see a critical path identified and fleshed out in more detail, something along the lines of a research proposal, plan for a commercial product, or even a really cool demo.

As for protocol, thought #1 is that it is hard to introduce an entirely new protocol because of the "two sided market" problem. A "good enough" protocol which gives you the data you need is better than a great protocol which has no data. You should look at OData as an example of a protocol that is well specified as opposed to GraphQL and see that the "one ring to bind them all" is really a system that can master all of the protocols. The rest of the world can (and will) do as it will.

------ Original Message ------
From: "Sebastian Samaruga" <ssama...@gmail.com>
To: "W3C Semantic Web IG" <semantic-...@w3.org>; "public-rww" <public-...@w3.org>; "DBpedia" <Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>; teiid-...@lists.jboss.org; d...@metamodel.apache.org
Sent: 8/23/2017 2:57:49 PM
Subject: [DBpedia-discussion] Protocol

Hi, newbie question again: what if a 'protocol' can be regarded as an issue for the 'data web' as there is one for the traditional 'document web'. The question is: does the design issues (ex.: RESTful application design patterns) of a document resource centric web holds (or at least part of them) for the concept of a 'data web' only because it relies in the same protocol / patterns (HTTP).

See attached file (or Protocol section in the link) for a first (confuse / abstract / questionable) set of thoughts in the subject:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OqsVn6uo0cr6qruzWj9yRASrmvAIAf4HsHuLS2aRSy8/edit?usp=drivesdk

Best Regards,
Sebastián.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
DBpedia-discussion mailing list
DBpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to