Hi John, Paul, all,
I'm assuming that you are going to talk about this approach in the upcoming
dev-meeting (since you posted under this subject)?
We are going to get some additional input an that subject from Rob Brennan
and Kevin Freeney: Evaluation results of the DBpedia ontology with their
prolog based Dacura Quality Service:
paper: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/system/files/swj1357.pdf
dacura: http://dacura.cs.tcd.ie
I personally would like to start over producing a consistent upper ontology
(or using an existing one: e.g. KKO: https://github.com/Cognonto/kko)
And then map to the old ontology. But this is only my initial thought on
this subject.
Unfortunately, since im on a project meeting today, I probably will not
have time to participate today :(.
I hope for a productive meeting,
See you soon.
Markus Freudenberg
Release Manager, DBpedia <http://wiki.dbpedia.org>
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Paul Houle <paul.ho...@ontology2.com> wrote:
> I do like "Sports" as a domain for a number of reasons, and I'd add that:
>
> (1) Expanding best practices in some sports (esp. "Soccer") to other
> sports would be a big help. (ex. "When did Joe Namath play for the jets?")
> (2) Part of the task is conceptual (for instance, the concept of
> "CareerStation", which is a non-topic-topic so far as Wikipedia is
> concerned.)
> (3) Having the instance data filled out is as important as having correct
> concepts.
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "John Flynn" <jflyn...@verizon.net>
> To: "'Sandra Praetor'" <sprae...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>;
> dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: 9/4/2017 9:54:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [DBpedia-discussion] REMIDER: Dev-Telco, Wednesday, September
> 6th
>
> A recommendation for consideration is to organize the dbpedia ontology into
>> domain specific segments. Looking at the current dbpedia ontology (1) owl
>> file it is a mess of random class and property statements. There is
>> absolutely no organization to the ontology, which makes it very
>> difficult/impossible for domain experts, or anyone else, to examine and
>> assess. A good way to first assess, and then clean up, the ontology would
>> be
>> to take one single domain of interest such as "sports" and create a
>> committee to really take a hard look at the ontology in terms of just that
>> single domain of interest. If the committee could really clean up that
>> domain the resulting owl statements and organization would act as a
>> template
>> and example for other dbpedia domains of interest. It seems attempting to
>> tackle the process of cleaning up the entire dbpedia ontology is just too
>> massive an undertaking. Breading out a single domain of interest for
>> extensive review and cleanup, as well as helping to organize the owl
>> ontology statements (1) into a readable and assessable format, would go a
>> long way to making the ontology manageable. Of course, there are many
>> dbpedia ontology statements that are not domain specific and which are
>> used
>> by multiple domains. As those are identified they can be organized into a
>> quasi dbpedia upper ontology.
>>
>> (1) http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-04/dbpedia_2016-04.owl
>>
>> John Flynn
>> http://semanticsimulations.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sandra Praetor [mailto:sprae...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de]
>> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2017 6:32 AM
>> To: dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: [DBpedia-discussion] REMIDER: Dev-Telco, Wednesday, September 6th
>>
>>
>> Dear DBpedia Developers,
>>
>> this is a kind reminder that the next dev-telco is scheduled for the
>> upcoming Wednesday, September 6th 2pm, CET.
>>
>> Please follow this link: https://www.gotomeet.me/dbpedia0917 to join the
>> meetings or check our dev meeting minutes:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZEhOv9Cp2LyBcyFc2J7PncsC
>> u5brov3_qRxKleMt
>> q60/edit#
>>
>> Hear you on Wednesday.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Sandra
>>
>> DBpedia Association
>>
>> Institute for Applied Informatics (InfAI) University of Leipzig
>> Hainstrasse
>> 11, 04109 Leipzig
>>
>> phone: 0049 341 9732355
>> email: prae...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de
>> slack: sandrapraetor
>> skype: praetorsa
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------
>> --
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging
>> tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> DBpedia-discussion mailing list
>> DBpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> DBpedia-discussion mailing list
>> DBpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> DBpedia-discussion mailing list
> DBpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
DBpedia-discussion mailing list
DBpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
