Hi all,

Do you have any further feedback on the proposal I wrote? Would be much 
appreciated since the deadline is approaching :).

In the meanwhile, I've created a Wiki page on dbpedia-extraction github about 
SPARQLing to DBpedia: 
https://github.com/dbpedia/extraction-framework/wiki/SPARQL-to-DBpedia. It is 
not complete yet, but is a start. I'm worried it's not in the right place 
(extraction framework), so I haven't linked it at the Home wiki page.

Greetings,

Denis

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 03:07:00 +0200
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-gsoc] DBpedia Better Display




Hi all,

The proposal now contains the feedback you provided. Is it good to send in. And 
what about a more advanced search function?

Regards,

Denis

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 16:09:24 +0200
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-gsoc] DBpedia Better Display




Hi,

I edited my proposal according to the comment. Do you have further feedback?

Regards,

Denis

From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:30:11 +0300
Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-gsoc] DBpedia Better Display
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]; [email protected]

Hi Max,


On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Max Jakob <[email protected]> wrote:


Hi,



On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas

<[email protected]> wrote:

>> About Spotlight annotations: I was also worried about the load on

>> Spotlight. [...] This feature would need a

>> large cache of rdfs:comment and rdfs:abstract annotations for every page.

>> [...]

>

> The way I think of this, we could implement this feature on user request,

> something like a button that is shown onhover, this will save a lot of load.



As one of the Spotlight guys, I like this idea.

Regarding the cache, it would have to have some kind of mechanism for

invalidation when a new Spotlight version is deployed.

This can also be built on top of the spotlight server. This will make the cache 
invalidation easier / safer :)
 




I also think that the *actual* annotations from the Wikipedia article

itself would maybe also be interesting to see. However, this data is

not yet extracted in RDF as part of the extraction framework, but only

as TSV in the Spotlight pipelines.

Sure! We can try to load that too on the next release

Cheers,
Dimitris
 




Cheers,

Max



-- 
Kontokostas Dimitris
                                          

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with 
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-gsoc mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-gsoc                       
                  

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with 
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-gsoc mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-gsoc                       
                  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-gsoc mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-gsoc

Reply via email to