In message <[email protected]>, Frank Habicht <[email protected]> wrote:
>I agree that making RADB "cleaner" than now would make a positive >operational impact. > >> Unfortunately, the folks at RADB don't listen to me when I tell them >> about problems in their published route data. (I think that maybe they >> don't like me. If so, they would certainly not be alone.) But I've >> been informed that they *do* listen when any RIR staff talks to them. > >I've once-or-twice told them of much more specific problems, with >explanation and supporting info for each case, and it went ok. >*maybe* too much change at once makes it "suspicious" to them.... I welcome anyone who may wish to try to get them to listen and/or see reason. I myself have never had any success in persuading them to do either. Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ DBWG mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/dbwg
