> From: John L > > I can see a need for reputation ratings, along with whitelists and > > blacklists of domain names. How much of this wil fit into DCC? > > Probably none. DCC doesn't key anything by domain, does it?
there is DCC whitelisting by domain name. > As you might suspect, the question of what you do with a DKIM signature > once you've verified it has come up before. > > Venal pitch: See, for example. http://www.domain-assurance.org The trouble with all mail bonding schemes is the nature of the third party. Who controls the criteria for assuring the virtue of mail senders and what keeps those criteria from changing? This question is related to the question of who costs of the providing the bonding, from salaries and bandwidth to the court costs related to revoking bonds? There are or have been many mail bonding organizations. As far as I know, all except those run by unsolicited bulk email senders have not been very profitable. Most organizations that can justify paying to have the virtue of their mail certified have significant problems with their mail being rejected by spam filters, and so tend to obvious preferences. There are never-spamming ESPs that can justify paying for a bond, but there are also others. The list of members of the Domain Assurance Council is classic http://www.domain-assurance.org/member-list.phtml includes organizations that I trust to never send unsolicited bulk email as well as other organizations that I think are otherwise. Vernon Schryver [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ DCC mailing list [email protected] http://www.rhyolite.com/mailman/listinfo/dcc
