| > (I am using different FIFO length since I know from experience that
otherwise the bridge
| > can also incur loss.)
| >
| Can you post scripts for altering the fifo length? Is that equivalent
| to the following for rate-limited? (from test page)
| /sbin/tc qdisc add dev lan0 root handle 1:0 netem delay $1ms
| /sbin/tc qdisc add dev lan1 root handle 1:0 netem delay $1ms
| /sbin/tc qdisc add dev lan0 parent 1:1 handle 10: tbf rate $2kbit
| buffer 10000 limit 30000
It is comparable but not equivalent, since in the above you are using a TBF
which will change the nature
of the traffic. I use the following (with qlen=10000):
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 netem delay ${delay}ms
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 pfifo limit ${qlen}
(The same configuration is used on both interfaces.) I found that merely adding
the tx qlen of the NIC
(via `ip link set ...') does not do much, and that especially if either the
delay is slightly longer
or the difference in traffic is drastic (e.g. 100Mbps link with a TBF rate of 1
Mbps), a longer FIFO
length is needed to avoid packets being dropped at the traffic shaper.
Plus, one gets all the nice statistics about queue drops and requeued etc.
| > I note that on
http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/DCCP_Testing#Network_emulation_setup
| > different loss values for forward/return are used. Has anyone further
experience with this?
| > I wonder if feedback loss has heavier implications than forward loss?
| >
|
| The reason for me putting zero % loss on return path is that we are
| testing unidirectional flows. As such I wanted all feedback to come
| back and if we lost feedback packets it would increase variability. We
| should test loss of feedback packets for protocol reasons but not so
| much for performance testing.
Ah - I see, so this means that for performance testing I'd have to use:?
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root netem delay 75ms loss 10% # the forward
path
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root netem delay 75ms # reverse
path (no feedback loss)
Maybe we should add a line on the OSDL page, it is something that had slightly
confused me.
| Your webserver seems to be down.... No pages on
| http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/ work at present.
Occasional, short downtime is possible, but usually the webserver runs all the
time. It is ok again.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
