Following Arnaldos suggestion and after re-reading Documentation/CodingStyle
I went through all the test tree patches, with the following changes (diff at
end of message):
* handling of `?' operator
* when one if/else statement is in braces, the other branches also should use
braces
* added references to which draft version (rev00) of rfc3448bis is used, as
promised earlier
Ian, I think you will be pleased to see that one ugly use of `?' in ccid3.c has
gone, and I have
now reverted to the statement you originally suggested.
I also updated your Faster-Restart patches in the repository to match the
changes below, so that
the patches now apply again.
--- b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
struct ccid3_hc_tx_sock *hctx = ccid3_hc_tx_sk(sk);
__u64 min_rate = 2 * hctx->ccid3hctx_x_recv;
const __u64 old_x = hctx->ccid3hctx_x;
- ktime_t now = stamp? *stamp : ktime_get_real();
+ ktime_t now = stamp ? *stamp : ktime_get_real();
/*
* Handle IDLE periods: do not reduce below RFC3390 initial sending rate
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@
goto out;
/*
- * Determine new allowed sending rate X as per draft rfc3448bis, 4.4
+ * Determine new allowed sending rate X as per draft rfc3448bis-00, 4.4
*/
if (hctx->ccid3hctx_t_rto == 0 || /* no feedback received yet */
hctx->ccid3hctx_p == 0 ) {
@@ -421,9 +421,12 @@
hctx->ccid3hctx_x_recv = opt_recv->ccid3or_receive_rate;
hctx->ccid3hctx_x_recv <<= 6;
- /* Update loss event rate (scaled by 1e6), cf. RFC 4342, 8.5 */
+ /* Update loss event rate (which is scaled by 1e6) */
pinv = opt_recv->ccid3or_loss_event_rate;
- hctx->ccid3hctx_p = (pinv == ~0U || pinv == 0)? 0 : scaled_div(1, pinv);
+ if (pinv == ~0U || pinv == 0) /* see RFC 4342, 8.5 */
+ hctx->ccid3hctx_p = 0;
+ else /* can not exceed 100% */
+ hctx->ccid3hctx_p = scaled_div(1, pinv);
/*
* Calculate new RTT sample and update moving average
@@ -433,7 +436,7 @@
hctx->ccid3hctx_rtt = tfrc_ewma(hctx->ccid3hctx_rtt, r_sample, 9);
/*
- * Update allowed sending rate X as per draft rfc3448bis, 4.2/4.3
+ * Update allowed sending rate X as per draft rfc3448bis-00, 4.2/3
*/
if (hctx->ccid3hctx_state == TFRC_SSTATE_NO_FBACK) {
@@ -777,7 +780,7 @@
ccid3_pr_debug("%s(%p), receive rate=%u bytes/s, implied "
"loss rate=%u\n", dccp_role(sk), sk, x_recv, p);
- return p == 0? ~0U : scaled_div(1, p);
+ return p == 0 ? ~0U : scaled_div(1, p);
}
static void ccid3_hc_rx_packet_recv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -913,7 +916,7 @@
val = &rx_info;
rx_info.tfrcrx_x_recv = hcrx->ccid3hcrx_x_recv;
rx_info.tfrcrx_rtt = hcrx->ccid3hcrx_rtt;
- rx_info.tfrcrx_p = hcrx->ccid3hcrx_pinv == 0? ~0U
+ rx_info.tfrcrx_p = hcrx->ccid3hcrx_pinv == 0 ? ~0U
: scaled_div(1, hcrx->ccid3hcrx_pinv);
break;
default:
--- b/net/dccp/options.c
+++ b/net/dccp/options.c
@@ -195,8 +195,9 @@
} else if (len == 4) {
opt_val = get_unaligned((u32 *)value);
elapsed_time = ntohl(opt_val);
- } else
+ } else {
goto out_invalid_option;
+ }
if (elapsed_time > opt_recv->dccpor_elapsed_time)
opt_recv->dccpor_elapsed_time = elapsed_time;
--- b/net/dccp/input.c
+++ b/net/dccp/input.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
[DCCP_RESET_CODE_MANDATORY_ERROR] = EOPNOTSUPP,
};
- return code <= DCCP_RESET_CODE_AGGRESSION_PENALTY? error_code[code] : 0;
+ return code > DCCP_RESET_CODE_AGGRESSION_PENALTY ? 0 : error_code[code];
}
static void dccp_rcv_reset(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
--- b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/loss_interval.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/loss_interval.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@
sizeof(struct tfrc_loss_interval),
0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL);
- return tfrc_lh_slab == NULL? -ENOBUFS : 0;
+ return tfrc_lh_slab == NULL ? -ENOBUFS : 0;
}
void __exit li_cleanup(void)
--- b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/tfrc.h
+++ b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/tfrc.h
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
*/
static inline u32 tfrc_ewma(const u32 avg, const u32 newval, const u8 weight)
{
- return avg? (weight * avg + (10 - weight) * newval) / 10 : newval;
+ return avg ? (weight * avg + (10 - weight) * newval) / 10 : newval;
}
extern u32 tfrc_calc_x(u16 s, u32 R, u32 p);
--- b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.c
@@ -345,11 +345,11 @@
{
int is_new_loss = 0;
- if (h->loss_count == 1)
+ if (h->loss_count == 1) {
__one_after_loss(h, skb, ndp);
- else if (h->loss_count != 2)
+ } else if (h->loss_count != 2) {
DCCP_BUG("invalid loss_count %d", h->loss_count);
- else if (__two_after_loss(h, skb, ndp)) {
+ } else if (__two_after_loss(h, skb, ndp)) {
/*
* Update Loss Interval database and recycle RX records
*/
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@
* it, but the cause does not seem to be here.
*/
DCCP_BUG("please report to [email protected]"
- " - prev = %u, last = %u",
+ " => prev = %u, last = %u",
rtt_prev_s(h)->ccval,
rtt_last_s(h)->ccval);
} else if (delta_v < 1) {
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@
sizeof(struct tfrc_rx_hist_entry),
0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL);
- return tfrcxh == NULL? -ENOBUFS : 0;
+ return tfrcxh == NULL ? -ENOBUFS : 0;
}
void __exit packet_history_cleanup(void)
--- b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid2.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid2.c
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@
static void ccid2_change_cwnd(struct ccid2_hc_tx_sock *hctx, u32 val)
{
/* XXX do we need to change ack ratio? */
- hctx->ccid2hctx_cwnd = val? : 1;
+ hctx->ccid2hctx_cwnd = val ? : 1;
ccid2_pr_debug("changed cwnd to %u\n", hctx->ccid2hctx_cwnd);
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
