Hi, On Mar 1, 2006, at 23:41, Lars Eggert wrote:
On Mar 1, 2006, at 20:10, Sally Floyd wrote:I sent in the revised version of draft-ietf-dccp-tfrc-voip-05.txt this morning, in response to feedback from Working Group Last Call.if you've had some comments about -04 during WGLC, please check if you're happy with -05. Otherwise, please yell. (Everyone else, please also check -05, but you should have really spoken up by now.)We'll officially end WGLC on Monday, pending negative feedback, and forward this draft to the IESG for approval.
we have not seen any further comments and thus assume that draft-ietf- dccp-tfrc-voip-05 has passed WGLC.
DCCP has been a testcase for the PROTO process in the past. We've dropped the ball a bit on this during the handover from Aaron to Tom and me, but I'd like to propose that we start using PROTO again, starting with this ID. Tom has agreed to be the document shepherd.
LarsPS: Good news from the RFC editor - the spec, both CCIDs and the problem statement have just hit AUTH48.
-- Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
