From: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [dccp] DCCP specification updates
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:56:19 -0300
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 > On 3/15/06, Eddie Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 > > Hi all,
 > >
 > > We have proofread the DCCP spec in detail for AUTH48, and have found a 
 > > number
 > > of technical nits.  There was one thing that I wanted to mention explicitly
 > > before AUTH48 ends.
 > >
 > > We propose to change the default value of the Allow Short Sequence Numbers
 > > feature to 0.
 > >
 > > Recap: DCCP sequence numbers can be either long (48 bits) or short (24 
 > > bits).
 > >   Short sequence numbers save header space, but leave connections at 
 > > greater
 > > risk for attack (and sequence number wrapping).
 > >
 > > It seems like stack implementations should default to long sequence 
 > > numbers,
 > > since this is safe, and allow short sequence numbers only if a connection 
 > > is
 > > known to be data-limited.  We can indicate this in the spec by setting 
 > > Allow
 > > Short Seqnos's default to 0.
 > >
 > > Quick comments OK.
 > 
 > FYI: The Linux implementation doesn't even support short sequence numbers
 > currently, haven't checked the NetBSD one.

The KAME implementaion includes minimal support for short seqeunce number.
If the shortseq variable in dccpcb is set to 1, DCCP tries to use
short sequecen number. However, no function to set the variable is implemented 
yet..
So, the proposal is quite OK.

Thanks,
--
Yoshifumi Nishida
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to