* Eddie Kohler | 2006-09-23 16:09:33 [-0700]: >TCP-BIC is a nonstandard TCP modification with significantly more >aggressive behavior. Whether or not CCID3 gets less than TCP-BIC gives no >information on fairness. Maybe TFRC gets less than its fair share, maybe >TCP-BIC gets MORE than its fair share, probably both. The fairness gold >standard at the moment is the most aggressive currently IETF-standardized >TCP variant, which is SACK+LT+etc. CCID3 should not get less than SACK+LT >under the same conditions.
Some days ago on linux netdev maillinglist, Douglas Leith posted experimental study results for some TCP congestion control algorithms. Scalable-TCP, HS, BIC, FAST and the like. I post this here because of the fair-share problematic. Maybe this is a interesting paper for some dccp subscribers. >Eddie HGN -- Linux forces a brain to configure Windows forces a brain-damaged configuration
