Ingemar -
I can only comment on the CCID-4 draft and I support that it becomes a
working group item esp. as it has potential to becoem useful for VoIP.
In a previous email to this group I gave an elaborate explanation of
the
properties of modern speech/audio codecs and possibly I can contribute
with text in this direction and how CCID-4 can address these issues as
good as possible.
CCID-4 is a fairly straightforward discussion of how TFRC-SP is
implemented in DCCP, so I don't think that a general discussion of
modern codecs goes in CCID-4.
My inclination would be for it to go in a separate informational RFC
with a discussion of issues with CCID-4 in actual use. It also makes
sense to me that a "deployment issues" document would have a
different time scale than the current CCID-4 specification document.
The CCID-4 specification document needs to be done first, so that
people can begin experimenting with CCID-4. Then a
"deployment issues" RFC could progress more slowly, along with
the actual use of CCID-4.
Does that sound reasonable?
- Sally
http://www.icir.org/floyd/
(On vacation in northern Minnesota.)
