Hi David,

On checking the pseudo-code and equations -- I have completed writing an
implementation of CCID 3 based on this draft (still debugging it
though), and have found the equations and pseudo-code to be accurate and
helpful.  The latest version of the draft does include feedback from
that implementation.

Tom P.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Gorry Fairhurst
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 3:01 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [dccp] [Fwd: FW: Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-
> 06.txt]
> 
> This includes a copy of Gen-ART review comments for TFRC.bis,
> 
> 
> Gorry
> 
> ----
> 
> 
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> 
> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
> or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-06.txt
> Reviewer: David L. Black
> Review Date: 19 May 2008
> IESG Telechat date: 22 May 2008
> 
> Summary:
> This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.
> 
> This is a well-written detailed draft updating an existing
> RFC on rate-based congestion control.  It has clearly had a
> high level of review by congestion control experts.
> 
> I have only done a generalist review, and in particular have
> not checked the equations and pseudo-code in detail.  I trust
> that the authors and reviewers in the DCCP WG to have done
> this level of review, as indicated by the change history.
> 
> idnits 2.08.10 found 1 line that was 1 character too long
> and pointed out that a -04 version of the rfc2581bis draft
> exists.  Neither of these need attention, as the RFC Editor
> will handle them in the normal course of editing activity.
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> ----------------------------------------------------
> David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
> EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> ----------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to