On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Andrew Lentvorski wrote:
re udp encapsulation
- Magnus Westerlund: issue will be discussed in tsvarea on Friday.
Magnus is split on the idea, he sees the benefit, but also the
concern
- Colin Perkins: we have an implementation of the nat encapsulation
- Murari Sridharan: lots of people are trying to implement, but the
lack of firewall traversal is stopping people. some udp encap would
be good.
- Markku Kojo: don't need a spec, just fill out the iana form
- Magnus: yes, but a spec is importent.
What was the final result about UDP encapsulation and NAT traversal?
You forgot to quote one line from this part:
- Colin: why don't we just publish Tom Phelan's draft as
experimental? Ask Tom to resubmit it (or I'll do it...)
I believe Tom plans to update the UDP encapsulation draft, and when
done, we will then see where to go from there.
- Pasi
