On Aug 23, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
I'll try to respond to this on behalf of the authors, here is what I
think:
* This seems a straight-forward piece of work that could be
implemented quickly too. It has been raised before, but I think now
would be an excellent time to progress this. It needs to be PS and
should take one IETF-cycle.
* I believe the editors do have cycles to conclude this quickly over
the next few months.
Thanks, sounds good.
* I think this does still need some review from others - e.g. from
the DCCP community; or/and RTP-based TFRC people to check the method
seems correct, and to confirm people understand the "problem" cases
that motivate the change. Comments are really welcome.
Indeed, it would be good to hear voices of support (or objection), and
get volunteers to read this. Anyone?
- Pasi
